Pages

Sunday, May 15, 2016

Siren's Song Yarns & Fibers
Summer/Fall Show Schedule


May 2016
8th @ The Village Marketplace at Lyric Hall, New Haven, CT
29th @ The Village Marketplace at Lyric Hall, New Haven, CT

June 2016
3-5th @ Myrkfaelinn Summer War Practice in Trumansburg, NY (SCA Event)
10th @ Southern Region War Camp in Manalapan, NJ (SCA Event)
25th @ Downtown Milford Farmers Market, Milford, CT
19th @ The Village Marketplace at Lyric Hall, New Haven, CT
26th @ The Village Marketplace at Lyric Hall, New Haven, CT

July 2016
2nd @ Downtown Milford Farmers Market, Milford, CT
3rd @ The Village Marketplace at Lyric Hall, New Haven, CT
9th @ Downtown Milford Farmers Market, Milford, CT
16th @ Downtown Milford Farmers Market, Milford, CT
24th @ The Village Marketplace at Lyric Hall, New Haven, CT

August 2016
28th @ The Village Marketplace at Lyric Hall, New Haven, CT

September 2016
3rd @ Downtown Milford Farmers Market, Milford, CT
4th @ The Village Marketplace at Lyric Hall, New Haven, CT
17th @ Downtown Milford Farmers Market, Milford, CT

October 2016

8th @ Downtown Milford Farmers Market, Milford, CT

Tuesday, April 12, 2016

Teasels, Alkanet, Madder, & Verdigris

A SCA friend, Iseaulte of Clews, recently asked me for these quotes from Ward, Jennifer (editor and translator), Elizabeth de Burgh, Lady of Clare (1295-1360) Household and Other Records, Boydell Press, @2014, ISBN# 978-1-84383-891-3
She was looking for references to textile tools. I threw in the natural dyes and mordants because I could.

From the October 1332
  • "Contents: Indenture made at Clare on 1 October 6 Edward iii (1332).....This indenture, made at Clare on 1 October 6 Edward iii witnesses that Hugh de Burgh, former Clerk of the Wardrobe of Lady Elisabeth de Burgh, Lady of Clare, delivered to Sir William le Blount the underwritten items in divers offices of the Lady's Household viz. from [?]Michaelmas of the preceding year....alkanet 1lb, .....verdigris .75 [lb]......" (page 65-66)
  • my notes: verdigris is both a green ink and a useful mordant for dyes. It is unclear for which it is intend here.

From the years 1336-1337
  • "Issues of the manor and sale of works...From fullers's teasels, nothing because they remain to be sold. From madder sold this year £1 3s. 6d......" (page 106)
  • "Tithe. ....For tithe of green beans, madder, beehives and other small items sold in the garden this year 3s. 11.24d." (page 108)
  • "Small necessaries.... 2 qr of teasel seed bought 3d." (page 109)

From the years 1339-1340
  • "Alkanet The same answers fro 2lbs of alkanet received from the remainder. Of this, for provisions of the household, .5 lbs And there remain 1.5 lbs.  audited" (page 60)

From the years 1342-1343
  • "Sale of wool. From 1 sack of white wool of Caythorpe, sold for making the Lady's cloth by Matilda Maynard £6 13s. 4d. From 5.5 stone of black wool of Caythopre sold for making cloth by the said Matilda, £1 8s. 2.25d. From 12 sacks of wool and 7 stone sold to Thomas de Canerbirs, drapers and citizen of London, £61 5 s., at £5 a sack.
  • Sum £61 6s. 6.25d.              audited" (page 104)

  • My note: Caythorpe, Nottingham, England

Monday, April 11, 2016

Textiles of Elizabeth de Burgh's Household

It has been a long while since I wrote anything for my blog. I have been spinning yarn like mad, weaving a little, doing some living history, teaching SCA classes, and writing 3 courses for Pennsic 45.

I taught a class on natural dyeing at Hrim Schola, in March 2016, which was a lot of fun. I will write a post about that later, particularly because I will be doing a lot more natural dyeing for a line of yarn I will be selling at farmers markets this summer.

Samples for my natural dyeing class at Hrim Schola, 2016


For Pennsic 45 I am teaching 3 courses:
e Constructive Feedback: How to Give it and How to Take It (Aug 8th, A&S Tent 5 @ 2pm)
e Textiles of Elizabeth de Burgh's Household (Aug. 11th, A&S Tent 3 @ 12pm)
e Motley, Checks, and Rays: Non-Monochrome Cloth (Aug 11th, A&S Tent 3 @ 2 pm)

The last two classes are based on the textiles found in the published household account books of Elizabeth de Burgh, Lady of Clare[1], the archaeological record from the same period in Europe and England, and other visual & written records of the time. The class Textiles of Elizabeth de Burgh's Household  covers what textiles were used within her household, from cloth-of-paris, to textiles for the livery of her household, textiles for her personal use, ecclesiastical textiles, tapestries & bedding.  The class Motley, Checks and Rays: Non-Monochrome Cloth covers how to use the household account books and other sources in your SCA experience, from shopping to dressing a entire household in a more period manner.  This class will primarily focus on wools for clothing which were far from the monochrome cloth we see in the SCA.

 The sources for these classes present problems for researchers. The archaeological record is literally fragmentary. We can learn about weave structure, fiber content, and sometimes color from the small fragments that are found in England's digs. However we cannot find the full width of the cloth, its intended purpose, nor anything about maker or purchaser. Here the written record and visual can fill in.  In the household account books, listings sometimes included the weaver or drapers name, for whom the fabric was purchases, its intended use, and even the length and width of fabric.  However it often lacks the details such as fiber content because that was simply understood by the accountants of the time.  The visual record does not give fiber content, no weave structure, but it can show how fabrics were used.

When these sources are viewed as a whole, we can create a reasonably complete picture of the fabrics of the large and prosperous household of Elizabeth de Burgh.  While it is not a perfect record, short of time travel, we will never truly have a complete picture.

What follows but one example of what we can learn from the household account books of Elizabeth de Burgh:

"This roll contains the measure of cloth for the livery of Lade de Burgh, 18 Edward III (1344). For the knights, 1 green cloth which measures 24 ells in length and 5.5 quarter ells in breadth [61.875 inches]; another, striped, which measures 23 ells in length and 1 ell in breadth....."[2] This continues for 8 knights not listed by name.

In the year 1344, cloth was commissioned or doled out for the livery of Elizabeth's household. I say commissioned because the total length of fabric given out in the full 1344 listing is 2144.75 ells[3] (2680 yards) for a very large contingent of knights, esquires, yeoman, grooms men. clerks and ladies, pages, middle clerks and ladies, serjeants, and little clerks. It is very likely to be impossible to simply walk into the largest markets in London and order this much yardage in the colors and patterns listed in the account books.  Nor are prices listed with particular listing. In other places the textiles are listed, along with intended purpose, with purchase price including fulling.  So where applicable costs are listed but not in this case. 

The other possibility is this is cloth they had in stock, had order by commission previously. This is a very real possibility because previous entries do list the same types of cloth with prices and fulling costs. Additionally the end of this listing for the knights says "Sum of cloths 8. And they contain in length 189.25 ells. And there remain 20 ells."
We can make an educated guess that this was also wool, rather than linen, cotton, or silk. The archaeological records support wool, wool was grown on Elizabeth de Burgh's estates in large quantities, and most convincing, a previous entry tells us "Purchase and making of cloth for livery.....Making 8 cloths for knights at £1 15 s each with 4 s for shearing, £14 4s....."[4] Although this listing is from November 1339 it lists 8 cloths for the knights with shearing. Shearing and fulling would only be done on wool. 

Further, we get this tantalizing detail from the same November 1339 listing "Silk bought for Robert de Glemisford for making stripes in the said cloths 9s."[5]  (Does this then mean that Robert de Glemisford was her weaver?) The silk mentioned was used to highlight stripes/rays of the period according to the contemporary English archaeological record.  Bands made of silk and wool survive in 12 extant examples. 5 date from the 2nd quarter of the 14th century, 7 are from the late 14th century.[6]  The archaeological record can tell us details about warp and weft, fiber content, weave structure, and color but can only give us a general picture of what the textiles of Elizabeth de Burgh's household were like because the fragments found do not directly correspond to the textiles the written record.  However they are worth considering.....

This is but a taste of these two classes. Come and find out more.
Handouts for all my classes will be available online via email after Pennsic 45.




[1] Ward, Jennifer (editor and translator), Elizabeth de Burgh, Lady of Clare (1295-1360) Household and Other Records, Boydell Press, @2014, ISBN# 978-1-84383-891-3
[2] Ward, Jennifer (editor and translator), Elizabeth de Burgh, Lady of Clare (1295-1360) Household and Other Records, Boydell Press, @2014, ISBN# 978-1-84383-891-3, page 72
[3] ells are 45 inches long
[4] Ward, Jennifer (editor and translator), Elizabeth de Burgh, Lady of Clare (1295-1360) Household and Other Records, Boydell Press, @2014, ISBN# 978-1-84383-891-3,page 39-40
[5] Ward, Jennifer (editor and translator), Elizabeth de Burgh, Lady of Clare (1295-1360) Household and Other Records, Boydell Press, @2014, ISBN# 978-1-84383-891-3, page 40
[6] Crowfoot, Elizabeth Frances Pritchard & Kay Staniland, Textiles and Clothing 1150-1450,  The Boydell Press and the Museum of London, Rochester NY, Copyright 2001, ISBN# 0-85115-840-4, page 55

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

3-D Printed Spindles (Christmas Spindles): The Test Drive


My friend, Petra Cosgrove-Trembly (of Kentswald Shetlands) and I took the time over a recent weekend to test drive the 3-d printed spindles that my husband made for me for Christmas.  The last post on the spindles is here.

We have deiced that for a first run these spindles work rather well.  You can see the video that we made of Petra working with them.  She is spinning from a wool and silk puni that I made with my new blending board.  As you can see in the rather tiny video (I cannot seem to make it larger), the spindle does have a kick when it spins.  This is not a huge problem but it does affect how long you can go without having to add more spin (kick makes spindles slow down).  The reason this spindle is kicking is because the holes in the arms are going the wrong way.  The smallest holes are near the center of the arms and the largest are towards the outside of the arms.  This should be the opposite.  


We also both agreed that the spindles need more weight added to the arms.  So what we really want in the next version is to remove the holes altogether.  Or if there are holes in the arms, they should be very small and only near the shaft.  The majority of the weight needs to be on the outside of the arms.  You can't add any bumps to the design because the arms need to be removable to get the center pull ball that Turkish spindles are known for.  In other words, this spindle needs to disassemble. 




We were also worried that the spindle texture from the 3-d printer (I'd have to ask my husband what plastic was used) would catch the delicate threads.  As you can see we had no trouble removing the arms.  Petra spins pencil-line fine yarns so our worries were unfounded.  Not only that, the texture worked in out favor because the yarn that might normally slip on a highly polished wood shaft during spinning stayed put on this one.



Now before you go and order up a dozen for teaching, you should know, these are really expensive to print.  For now, hand made wood ones are cheaper.  And the plastic is brittle and can break if you drop them.  

Thursday, January 8, 2015

Young Noble Girls Italian Gamorra and Giornea c. 1490 near Florence


Miss E in her camicia, gamorra, and tie-on sleeves.
This is my brief historic documentation for an outfit that I created in 2011 for my daughter.  It was intended for and presented in an informal setting.  I have added some annotations since then.

The goal of this project was to create a complete outfit (hábito) for my daughter, referred to here as Miss E, age 6, that was both functional and worthy of court.  Certain considerations needed to be made for her growth so that this outfit could be worn for many years.  I will discuss these adaptations in my sewing construction notes as they can be applied to other garments.  The outfit also needed to remain correct in it elements and silhouette throughout any changes Miss E will go through over time.  I choose to do a gown from the Italian Renaissance (also now called the early modern period by scholars). The outfit is composed of a camicia (chemise), a gamorra (gown), giornea (tabard but might also be called a guarnacca) and a set of detachable sleeves.  A set of panni lini di gamba (linen stocking) would also have be added to this outfit along with shoes and a caul but I have not constructed them as yet.  (Annotation: She out grew the outfit before I could add them.)


Miss E in the complete outfit including the giornea
Frescoes in the Tornabuoni Chapel of the Santa Maria Novella-Birth of Saint John the Baptist (detail) - by Domenico Ghielandaio - 1486-90 - Florence, Italy
In general terms, clothing for children echoed that of their parents in style and function until the Victorian period with only small accommodations made for nature of children, such as deep hems to accommodate growth.  Fashion scholars sometimes refer to the children in these elaborate outfits as "little adults" and the implication is that the child thus filled a more adult like role in the house hold.  The idea that children were "little adults" I think is partially flawed because that it assumes that children might behave a little adults which, as any parent can tell you, is impossible.  Children, were however, a important part of a family both symbolically and physically.  They were the future of the family and for noble families that meant they were often put upon display for political, symbolic, and financial reasons.  Therefore, I believe, the set of garments I have made, because it is a very luxurious, were not for daily use around the home but rather a set used to enhance the reputation of the family as a whole under certain circumstances.  It would have been worn for a special occasion such as a court appearance, a holiday, a marriage, or to have a portrait painted.  This is not to say a noble household would dress their children in less luxurious or comfortable clothing the rest of the time.  I believe that the clothing for daily use would never diminish the families reputation but was also not as elaborate as those created for the high holidays and weddings.

The sources we have for these garments are usually paintings (my primary sources) which almost always shows individuals in their best attire due to the enduring and expensive nature of a painting rather than their clothing for daily use.  The paintings themselves were designed to enhance the reputation of the family as a whole just as the luxurious garments were in real life.  Young children were not widely painted until later in the early modern period (16th century).  There are a few paintings from the early Italian renaissance that show young girls in them but the children are shown as part of the household and not on their own.  This would change as a young girl would reach a marriageable age, approximately age thirteen.

These paintings show young girls with their families but they are both a little off-point for the gown I constructed for Miss E.  They are presented primarily to demonstrate that young girls were dressed like miniature adults for specific occasions or reasons.  The Daughters of Giovanni II Bentivoglio and Ginevra Sforza are a little before the period of the garments I made but more importantly they are from a different location with different regional dress than Florence.  The Daughters is from Ferrara, located in the Northeastern end of Italy, compared to Florence, located approximately 160 miles to the South.  It's not far by our standards of modern travel but for the medieval world it would be a considerable but not an insurmountable distance, thus allowing for regional differences.   The second painting, The Miracle of the Cross at the Bridge of Saint Lorenzo, is separated from my project by both time and distance.  So again both examples are used to illustrate that young noble girls were well dressed on special occasions and were considered to be an important part of the family and its reputation.  

The Daughters of Giovanni II Bentivoglio and Ginevra Sforza from the Bentivoglio Altarpiece - by Lorenzo Costa - 1488 - It is displayed in the Bentivoglio Chapel of the church of San Giacomo MaggioreBolognaItaly.

The Miracle of the Cross at the Bridge of Saint Lorenzo- detail of Venetian Ladies - by Gentile Bellini,- 1500 - located in the Galleria dell'Accademia, Venice 
Historic Sources and the Sewing Process
I find it generally useful to being this discussion with a list of terms used.  Below please find a brief list of historic terms for the parts this outfit.  In addition, as I discuss each part of the outfit, beginning from the chemise (camicia) and working outward, I will include a small selection of references for each rather than separating the sections of this documentation into sewing and historic sources.  

Terms/Glossary[1]
Camicia - chemise
Cuscitrice - a woman seamster
Gamorra - a woman's garment or gown (also Gamurra)
Giornea - tabard
Gonna - a woman's upper gown, robe or mantle
Guarnacca - a kind of upper garment for women (also Guarnaccia)
Gonnellaro - a woman's robe maker
Magnossetta - a little coif or caul
Panni lini di gamba - linen hose or stockings
Rezzola - a coif or caul of fine net work such as women use to wear
Sbraccita - a find of sleeveless garment, also open or without arms.
Stringhette - little, small points, laces ...or such bindings
Ucchiéllo - an eyelet hole, a buttonhole

All of the garments were constructed with both machine and hand sewing techniques, but the former was limited to locations that would not show in daily use (the inside seams).  Hand finishing techniques were used for all sewing that would be visible to the viewers when the gown was worn. My general rule for historic reconstructions of any garment, is machine sewing is allowed but never in a visible location.  (Annotation: There are, of course, some exceptions, as I have hand sewn a few garments completely over the years.)

The camica (chemise) was made of light weight 100% linen.  The pattern is  made of simple rectangles with a gentle scope neckline that was gathered to fit on a flat band.  The pattern pieces were clipped and torn to measure from Miss E's arm length, wrist circumference and height.  Extra volume was added to allow the camica to show at the top of the arm, elbow and forearm as seen in many paintings including Frescoes in the Tornabuoni Chapel of the Santa Maria Novella-The Nativity of Mary (detail) by Domenico Ghirlandaio.[2]  Additionally gathers were put at the center front of the garment to allow them to show later if her chest circumference grew and the gamorra (gown) begins to fashionably gap.  (This was one of the best choices I made, because she wore the gamorra several times.)  The wrist and neck were closed with thread loops and either buttons from Billy and Charlie's Fine Pewter Goods or a hook from a hook and eye set.  The neckline had to have a slit put into it to allow it to pass over the head.  As in historic examples this camica is bright white; it should be noted that bright white linen was designed to be seen because it was expensive and therefore the color, texture, and drape of this garment mattered.  It was not simply underwear.  


(detail) The Nativity of Mary, Frescoes in the Tornabuoni Chapel of the Santa Maria Novella - by Domenico Ghirlandaio - 1485-1490 - Florence, Italy
The gamorra (gown) was made from light weight silk twill in a light blue and a adorned with a single blue and gold ribbon at the neckline.  The garment closes in the center front with eyelets from Billy and Charlie's Fine Pewter Goods because I did not want to put hand sewn eyelets (ucchiéllo) into this fabric which frays very easily and is not very strong.  I have also used the same eyelets to attach the points of the sleeves at the shoulder seam.  I drafted the pattern and used a muslin mock up to test the fit of the gown on Miss E.  It has the typical high waisted appearance that can be found in Domenico Ghirlandaio's Saint Francis Stories in the Saddetti Chapel-Resurrection of the Notary's Son (detail) from 1482-85 (shown below).  Other paintings illustrate this shape, including Gentile Bellini's The Miracle of the Cross at the Bridge of Saint Lorenzo (detail) c. 1500 and Domenico Ghielandaio's Frescoes in the Tornabuoni Chapel of the Santa Maria Novella-Birth of Saint John the Baptist (detail), 1486-90.  In the later case it is the servants in the orange and red gowns that are useful in illustrating the cut and fit of the gamorra because a noble woman would be shown with more layers hiding the silhouette of the gamorra.  In the case of my gowns I made it so it would open at the center from as seen in many of the gowns including the servant girl in the red gown and on a number of noble women in the other paintings shown (the Portrait of Giovanna Tornabuoni for example, shown below)  The skirt of the gown was pleated into place on the high waist line.  The bodice was lined and topstitched on all the seams and edges both to press them flat and to keep them from fraying further.  The skirt is unlined but the seams were topstitched and finished to prevent fraying.

Saint Francis Stories in the Saddetti Chapel-Resurrection of the Notary's Son (detail) - by Domenico Ghirlandaio - 1482-1485- Florence, Italy
Frescoes in the Tornabuoni Chapel of the Santa Maria Novella-Birth of Saint John the Baptist - by Domenico Ghielandaio - 1486-90 - Florence, Italy- 1486-90 - Florence, Italy
As to fit in the future, a number of these gowns (Portrait of Giovanna Tornabuoni and Frescoes in the Tornabuoni Chapel of the Santa Maria Novella-Birth of Saint John the Baptist, detail of the noble women on the right in pink and a servant in red and green in the back)  show a gap in the laceings at center from allowing the camica to show.  As Miss E grows the front of this gown will begin to gap fashionably.  Also a generous two inch hem will allow her to gain height.  (Annotation: both of these modifications proved useful)

Detail photo of Miss E's sleeves.  They are tied on with
silk ribbons.  The sleeves have been embellished with
gold sequins and garnet beads.
The sleeves on this gown are detachable as seen in many paintings shown thus far and there are further examples below. It should be noted that there were many styles of sleeves in Florence in the 1480-1490s.  The style I choose was only one of many possibilities.    The nature of the tie-on or partially-sewn-on sleeve line, allows the camica to show at the sleeve cap.  The cut of the sleeves varies in these paintings.  In many cases the sleeves are cut to allow the camica to show in gaps at the elbow and forearm.  I did not want to do a complicated pattern with a lot of slashes or cuts as seen in The Visitation, Fresco Cappella Tornabouoni, by Domenico Ghirlandaio (shown below), but rather something simple  such as The Birth of St. John in the same frescoes (shown above in full and in detail).  The weight of the fabric and its willingness to fray at a moment's notice meant that it needed to be both simple and fully lined (which dealt with the fraying but added to the weight and stiffness of the sleeves). 

The pattern was drafted by hand with a sleeve seam line on the back of the arm (as seen in many gowns from the early 14th century onward) rather than the under arm like most modern sleeves.  This allows the elbow to bend at the correct point and the textile pattern to be shown off to maximum effect.  I flat-lined  the sleeves with the same violet even weave silk that was used for the giornea lining.  This allowed me to topstitch the edges as I had with the gown and to then hand sew the back seam line together with a whip stitch.  This allowed for two things: the look I wanted at this moment and when she grows the arm seam line and be undone and more lacing points can be added.  The sleeve is currently a little long on her arm as you can see on the picture with her elbow being a little high for the sleeve.  While this is not what I intended it's a blessing in disguise because it will allow for growth.  I embellished the textile pattern with small garnet beads and gold sequins.  There is more information later in the documentation on the textile patterns used for both the sleeves and the giornea.  
The Visitation (detail), Fresco Cappella Tornbuoni - by Domenico Ghirlandaio - 1485-1490 - Santa Marria Novella, Florence Italy
The giornea (tabard) is an over robe that is worn by some wealthy young women during the late 15th century.  Domenico Ghirlandaio's Portrait of Giovanna Tornabuoni from 1488 shows the young woman wearing a orange giornea but a better view of the same gown can be found in Frescoes in the Tornabuoni Chapel of the Santa Maria Novella-Visitation (detail), 1486-90, also by Domenico Ghirlandaio (shown just above).  The young lady and her gown are the same in both paintings.  There is also another painting by the same artist that shows a giornea: Frescoes in the Tornabuoni Chapel of the Santa Maria Novella-Birth of Saint John the Baptist (detail) from 1486-90 (shown above).  Others can be seen in paintings by Gentile Bellini.

Portrait of Giovanna Tornabuoni - by Domenico Ghirlandaio - 1488 - tempera on panel - Lugano, Thyssen Collection (Elliott, page 52)
I have made this giornea out of a rayon/silk blend with a lavender, even weave, silk lining.  I chose the outer fabric for the pattern and used it to drive the color choices for the rest of the outfit.  While I would have preferred the more historic figured, 100% silk for the top layer, it was cost prohibitive and on a garment that would not last more than a year or two, I could not cost justify it.

The shape of the giornea is an open sided garment with a deep v-neck (in at least the front, as no back view I know of exists) that shows off the gown below it.  In the back there is a train.  It is a simple pattern to make and like the other parts of this garment I drafted my own.  Once I cut the back and the front I stitched them individually, bag lining them and hand stitching the edges to make them perfectly flat.   Rather than attaching the shoulders before bag lining them I did it afterwards.  The shoulders were overlapped and hand stitched together so that when Miss E grows they can be unsewn and reattached adding a little length.  The overlap is about 1.5 inches.

A back view of the giornea.  You can clearly
see top stitching along the edges.
Historically this garment would not be bag lined (nor would any garment) but rather a method similar to flat lining was used.  I have chosen to bag line this garment because it is easier for me and this is a child's garment. The results are almost indistinguishable from edge stitching two layers together and then top stitching them.  I know how Miss E will wear it and wear it out.  While I'm willing to put a lot of effort into a garment for her, fully hand sewing them at this time is not an option.

The tabard and the sleeves would have been made of the most luxurious fabrics in the entire outfit.   

Textiles
I will not bother with the documentation for the basic fiber types that comprise this garment, that is silk and linen, as this is well covered ground.  A mention is, however, due for the patterns used on the giornea and sleeves as an attempt to use patterns similar to historic patterns was made.  Italian textiles dominated the market during the early modern period, with Florence, Genoa, Lucca, Milan and Venice dominating production of fine silks.[3]  It is rare however to be able to attribute a specific textile pattern to a specific location.  None of the examples seen here can be.  Many of the fine silks of the period were designed for use in wealthy homes, palaces, and most often, the Church.  One need only look at the paintings of the early modern period, including those provided in this documentation, to see that personal adornment was also a use for these textiles.

In the case of the silk giornea the style of patterns, flowers within lozenges, can be dated from the later 16th century from both Italy and the Ottoman Empire.  Examples of similar historic patterns can be found in the Keir Collection, the MET and the V&A Museum.  The dominate features of these silks is symmetrical curvilinear vines in a lattice pattern or lozenges.[4]  Examples of this type of pattern, dating from the late 16th century can be seen below.  They are similar to the silk that I used for Miss E's giornea expect the scale on the one I used is smaller. 

Brocatelle dalmatic apparels, Italy - second half of the 16th century, acquired in Florence - The silk is yellow on a green back ground and the pattern measures 45 x 14 cm (King, pages 140-143)
Silk and linen lampas cover or hanging - Italy - second half of the 16th century - The silk is a yellow on a blue background with the pattern measuring 56 x 13.6 cm (King, pages 141-143)
Since the pattern used for the giornea is not quite authentic to the time period of the gown (my gown is c. 1490 vs the extant textiles listed above are from 1550-1600) I feel I should mention what would have been used.  The fingered silks, as seen in Frescoes in the Tornabuoni Chapel of the Santa Maria Novella-Visitation detail by Domenico Ghirlandaio (shown above) were most likely of a lampus, brocade, or damask in technique and similar to the other extant lampus of the 1400's in style.  (A lampas is defined as a weave generally warp faced, with the pattern formed by floats of weft and brocaded weft ground by a binding warp.)  They typically feature large patterns of lozenges with symbolic objects, such as animals, crosses, suns or crowns, woven into them.  These figures are often heraldic in nature and thus highly symbolic.  This is clearly seen in Domenico Ghirlandaio's Frescoes in the Tornabuoni Chapel of the Santa Maria Novella-Visitation (detail) from 1486-90 on the young lady's giornea.[5] The main difference in pattern choice between the frescoes and the extant textiles shown from the late 16th century is that the animals, crosses, suns and other symbolism have been replaced with flowers, leaves, and vases.  The lozenges that surround the figures or flowers remain similar. Thus I think that the fabric I choose is a reasonable compromise between cost, authentic materials, time periods and authentic designs.

The sleeve fabric was picked purely for its colors and pattern and not its fiber content.  Normally I would not work in these fibers (rayon and polyester) but in this case I choose to make an exception due to the similarity in both pattern and color.  The sleeve fabric was bought at least 4 years after the silk for the giornea.  It is not a truly documentable pattern either but is similar in style and size to the textiles found on the sleeves of Antonio del Pollaiolo's (AKA Antonio Pollaiuo) profile paintings of young women dating from approximately 1460-1475.  These images show young women with relatively (but not always) plain gowns with very ornamental sleeves.  The patterns on these sleeves are large and bold, mostly floral in nature.  The pattern I therefore looked for in my sleeve choice was one that was in the correct colors, larger than the pattern for the giornea, floral and bold.  I wanted it to stand out on its own so that it could be worn both with and without the giornea as my daughter wished.  In the period these textiles would of course be silk, most likely a brocade, lampas, or damask in nature.  Given that these silks are featured in Italian paintings, it is very likely that they were Italian in origin.

In short, the textile patterns I choose for this project are 50 to 100 years later or earlier  than the garments themselves, in style.  I chose them in part because I had the primary fabric for the giornea in my stash for years and did not mind parting with it for this project.  I chose it also in part because it was the most "Italian" of the silks that I owned and spending another $100 a yard on fabric for this project was not possible.  I needed something with a pattern that was not obviously and glaringly modern as many other options were.  So this was, a compromise.  I also had all the other fabrics, except the sleeve fabric, in my stash to make a coordinated outfit and thus the textiles chosen made for a viable compromise. If a better fabric comes along for the sleeves, they are easily replaced.





[1] Wake, Anabella: A Glossary of Sixteenth Century Italian Words Relating to Costume, (transcribed from Florio's Worlde of Wordes, 1598) 2004, <http://realmofvenus.renaissanceitaly.net/wardrobe/florio.htm>
[2] Domenico Ghirlandaio - Frescoes in the Tornabuoni Chapel of the Santa Maria Novella-Visitation (detail) - 1486-90 - Santa Maria Novella, Florence (Beck, James H. Italian Renaissance Painting, page 304)
[3] King, Monique and Donald King, European Textiles in the Keir Collection 400 BC to 1800 BC,  page 126
[4] King, page 126
[5] King, pages 43-67

Bibliography: Books and Online Resources

Beck, James H. Italian Renaissance Painting, Konemann Verlagsgesellschaft, 1999. ISBN# 3-8290-0486-9

Elliott, Sara, Italian Renaissance Painting, New York, Phaidon, 1993. ISBN# 0-7148-2868-8

Frick, Carole Collier, Dressings Renaissance Florence: Families, Fortunes and Fine Clothing, Baltimore, Maryland, John Hopkins University Press, 2002.  ISBN# 0-8018-8264-8

Jones, Ann Rosalind & Peter Stallybrass, Renaissance Clothing and the Materials of Memory, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 2007. ISBN# 978-0-521-78663-8

King Monique and Donald King, European Textiles in the Keir Collection 400 BC to 1800 AD, London, Faber and Faber, 1990. ISBN# 0-571-13370-1

Mola, Luca, The Silk Industry of Renaissance Venice, Baltimore, Maryland, John Hopkins University Press, 2000.  ISBN# 0-8018-6189-6

Rublack, Ulinka, Dressing Up: Cultural Identity in Renaissance Europe, London, Oxford University Press, 2010. ISBN# 978-0-19-929874-7

Wake, Anabella: A Glossary of Sixteenth Century Italian Words Relating to Costume, (transcribed from Florio's Worlde of Wordes, 1598) 2004, <http://realmofvenus.renaissanceitaly.net/wardrobe/florio.htm>